ISSN : 2146-3123
E-ISSN : 2146-3131

Clinical Characteristics of Nail Unit Melanoma in Türkiye: The Experience of Two Tertiary Dermatology Centers
Tuğba Atcı1, Muhammed Burak Günay1, Şirin Yaşar2, Nesimi Büyükbabani3,4, Pembegül Güneş5,6, Şule Öztürk Sarı4, Zuhal Kuş Silav5, Can Baykal1, Fatih Göktay2,7
1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
2Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
3Department of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
4Department of Pathology, İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
5Clinic of Pathology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
6Private Pathology Practice, İstanbul, Türkiye
7Private Dermatology Practice, İstanbul, Türkiye
DOI : 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2024-12-52
Pages : 157-163

Abstract

Background: The literature on the clinical presentations of nail unit melanoma (NUM) in different countries is limited.

Aims: To assess the specific clinical characteristics of NUM in Türkiye.

Study Design: A retrospective cross sectional study.

Methods: Patients with NUM in two centers were retrospectively evaluated for their clinicopathological features, including the location, laterality, destruction of the nail plate, erosion or ulceration, presence of longitudinal melanonychia (LM), Hutchinson’s sign (HS), and the absence of pigmentation and Breslow thickness. These variables were compared in terms of the main location of the NUMs (fingernail versus toenail).

Results: A total of 37 patients (54.1% female) of mean age 61.9 ± 14.8 years were enrolled. In most cases, NUMs were located in the fingernails (62.2%), with the most common location being the thumbnails (45.9%), followed by the big toenails (32.4%). Five cases had in situ melanoma presenting with LM. The mean Breslow thickness of invasive NUM lesions (n = 26) was 4.7 ± 4.1 mm (median: 3). Although all in situ NUMs were located on the hands, no statistically significant difference was noted in the Breslow thickness of invasive NUMs on the toenails and fingernails. NUMs were hypomelanotic/amelanotic in 10 (27%) patients. LM was clinically evident in 40.5% of the patients and was significantly more frequently observed on fingernails. The HS of the nail folds was noted in 40.5% of the patients, with the proximal (73.3%) and distal (73.3%) nail folds being most commonly involved. Total or partial destruction of the nail plate was recorded in 24.3% and 51.4% of the patients, respectively. Erosion and/or ulceration on the surface of the NUM was clinically present in most (75.7%) cases. Invasive NUMs associated with LM (n = 10) displayed partial destruction of the nail plate (n = 9), erosion and/or ulceration on the tumor surface (n = 7), and HS (n = 6).

Conclusion: The clinical characteristics of patients with NUM, such as more common localization on the hands, a high rate of preference for thumbnail and big toe, and the ratio of HS, were similar to the studies reported from diverse countries. Partial destruction of the nail plate is an important clinical feature of NUM. Furthermore, LM is more frequently observed in NUMs on the fingernails.

Viewed : 369
Downloaded : 196