ISSN : 2146-3123
E-ISSN : 2146-3131

Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Needle Biopsy Which Needle for Which Patient: A Prospective Randomized Study
Emre Çelik1, Muzaffer Metintaş1,2, Güntülü Ak1,2, Hüseyin Yıldırım1, Emine Dündar3, Nevin Aydın4, Selma Metintaş2,5
1Department of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye
2Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye
3Department of Pathology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye
4Department of Radiology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye
5Department of Public Health, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye
DOI : 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-4-90
Pages : 321-328

Abstract

Background: Given the growing incidence of pleural effusions and the limited availability of medical thoracoscopy (MT) in clinical practice, ultrasound (US)-guided pleural needle biopsies using Abrams or cutting needles are increasingly being used for the histopathological diagnosis of pleural diseases.

Aims: To assessed the diagnostic yield and safety of US-guided Abrams and cutting needles to determine the optimal needle type for specific clinical situations.

Study Design: Prospective randomized study.

Methods: The study included 174 patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion requiring histopathological evaluation. Patients were randomized into two arms: those who underwent US-guided cutting needle biopsy (US-CNPB) and those who underwent US-guided Abrams needle biopsy (US-ANPB).

Results: The US-CNPB group exhibited a false-negative rate of 36.9% and diagnostic accuracy of 63.0%. compared to 21.3% and 78.7% in the US-ANPB group, with significant differences between the groups
(p = 0.036 and 0.045, respectively). In patients with pleural thickening
< 1 cm or absent on US, US-CNPB exhibited 55.2% diagnostic accuracy and a negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of 0.57. For US-ANPB, the corresponding rates were 77.3% and 0.32. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups was significant (p = 0.009). In patients with pleural thickening ≥ 1 cm, the diagnostic accuracy of US-CNPB was 93.3% and 88.9% for US-ANPB, with no significant difference between the groups. The corresponding -LR values were 0.08 and 0.17. In patients with pleural thickening < 1 cm, four major bleeding events (6.9%) occurred in the US-CNPB group. No deaths were reported in this study.

Conclusion: US-CNPB should be preferred in patients with pleural thickness ≥ 1 cm on US. MT is recommended for patients with pleural thickening < 1 cm or those presenting with pleural effusion without pleural thickening. However, in the absence of MT, US-ANPB is the preferred alternative because of its superior diagnostic accuracy and procedural safety.

Viewed : 10
Downloaded : 6