Background: Atrial fibrillation is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia. It is now established that atrial high-rate episodes are highly correlated with atrial fibrillation.
Aims: To investigate the relation between diastolic electrocardiographic parameters and subclinical atrial fibrillation detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Study Design: Ccross-sectional study.
Methods: A total of 203 patients who had a dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacing pacemaker implanted due to sinus node dysfunction were prospectively enrolled in this study. Atrial high-rate episodes were defined as any lasting more than 5 min with an atrial rate of ≥220 beats per minute during the previous year. Patient groups were categorized on the basis of pacemaker interrogation as the absence of atrial high-rate episodes [atrial high-rate episodes (-)] and the presence of atrial high-rate episodes [atrial high-rate episodes (+)]. Episodes related to atrial over sensing were excluded. Twelve-lead surface electrocardiography was independently analyzed by two experienced readers for the measurement of diastolic electrocardiography parameters.
Results: Among 203 patients (mean age: 67.5±9.1, 60.1% male), 51 (25.1%) with atrial high-rate episodes were defined as group 1 and 152 (74.9%) without atrial high-rate episodes were defined as group 2. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors. Tend-Q and Tend-P were significantly longer in group 2. PQ interval was statistically longer in group 1. Corrected QT interval was significantly longer in group 1. Diastolic electrocardiography index, heart rate and PQ and QT intervals were the only independent predictors of atrial high-rate episodes in patients with dual pacemakers in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Abnormal diastolic electrocardiography parameters are powerful predisposing factors for the initiation of incident atrial fibrillation. Diastolic electrocardiography parameters and a novel diastolic index predict atrial high-rate episodes. Evaluating these parameters enables clinicians to identify patients who are at high risk and who may benefit from prophylactic treatment.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common clinically significant arrhythmias. The association of AF with an increased risk of stroke is not dependent on whether it is clinically symptomatic (1). The risk of stroke is doubled in the presence of AF (2). Subclinical AF is proposed to be the underlying mechanism in patients with ischemic stroke of unknown etiology, which constitutes approximately 25% of total ischemic stroke events (3,4). Technological advances in pacemaker systems have enabled the detection, analysis and storage of atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) during device interrogation, which in turn, has led to the emergence of the term "silent AF" (5). AHREs are surrogates for clinically asymptomatic AF and they have recently been demonstrated to be highly correlated with atrial flutter and AF, especially when AHRE are >5 min in duration (6). Therefore, AHRE are considered a significant indicator and precursor of AF. Several previous studies demonstrated that thromboembolism risk is associated with the total duration or burden of AF detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) (7,8).
Diastolic dysfunction (DD) shares many common risk factors with AF, including age, hypertension (HT) (9), obesity (10) and diabetes (11). DD has deleterious effects on atrial function and structure, many of which are pro-arrhythmic. It has been shown that DD is a significant predisposing substrate for AF (12). There are several limitations in most non-invasive measurements of left ventricular relaxation, stiffness and filling pressures. These measurements are often established on simplified assumptions, which makes the probability of their general application low. Moreover, their assessment is highly dependent on hemodynamic parameters such as preload, afterload and sympathetic tone (13). The non-invasive measurements of left ventricular relaxation, stiffness and filling pressures are usually indirect. In addition, they are mostly based on simplified assumptions. For these reasons, they are considered to have limitations and are not generally applicable. Changing preload, afterload and sympathetic tone can affect their assessment, even in the same patient, complicating their measurement and interpretation (13). In contrast, hemodynamic changes have no impact on electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters. ECG parameters are operator-independent and show significant reproducibility (14). Diastolic ECG parameters such as PQ, Tend-P, Tend-Q and a combined novel ECG index consisting of age, PQ-interval and Tend-P [Tend-P/(PQ x age)] have relatively high accuracy in diagnosing DD (15). In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the association between diastolic ECG parameters and subclinical AF detected by CIED.
The study population consisted of 203 patients (mean age: 67.5±9.1, 60.1% male) with dual pacemakers who were divided into two groups with regards to the presence of AHRE in their pacemaker interrogations. Fifty-one (25.1%) patients with AHRE were defined as group 1 and 152 (74.9%) patients without AHRE were defined as group 2. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data regarding both groups are given in Table 1. The demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors were comparable between the two groups. Echocardiographic variables, including left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, ejection fraction, wall thickness and left atrial diameter were also comparable between the two groups. Serum sodium levels were significantly higher in patients with AHRE. Serum potassium and serum calcium levels were similar in both groups (Table 1).
Mean heart rate was higher in group 1 as expected, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tend-Q was significantly longer in group 2 [401.6±18.1 millisecond (msec) vs. 504.0±27.1 msec, p<0.001]. Also, Tend-P was significantly longer in group 2 (253.4±16.9 sec vs. 370.9±18.8 msec). According to PQ interval (166.3±9.5 msec vs. 147.5±11.0 msec), there was statistically significant prolongation in group 1. The corrected QT interval was significantly longer in group 1. Similarly, QRS duration was found to be significantly longer in group 1 patients (Table 2).
Univariate analysis revealed that diastolic ECG index, serum potassium levels, heart rate and PQ and QT intervals were associated with the presence of AHRE. Diastolic ECG index, heart rate and PQ and QT intervals were the only independent predictors of AHRE in patients with dual pacemakers in multivariate analysis (Table 3). ROC analysis was performed for predictors of AHRE. ROC analysis revealed 58.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity, 100% positive and 87.9% negative predictive values for PQ >151 msec (AUC: 0.884, 95% CI: 0.832-0.925, p<0.001, Figure 2). It also revealed a 38.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, 100% positive and 81.3% negative predictive values for QTc >420 msec (AUC: 0.665, 95% CI: 0.595-0.729, p=0.004, Figure 3); 76.4% sensitivity and 78.5% specificity, 54.9% positive and 90.9% negative predictive values for diastolic ECG index <0.0342 (AUC: 0.850, CI: 0.793-0.896, p<0.001, Figure 4).
The present study is the first to investigate the association between diastolic ECG parameters and diastolic ECG index with asymptomatic device-detected AF. Our main findings were; 1) ECG diastolic parameters and diastolic index were significantly longer in the AHRE group, 2) Diastolic ECG index, serum potassium levels, heart rate and PQ and QT intervals were associated with the presence of AHRE according to univariate analysis, 3) Multivariate analysis showed that diastolic ECG index, heart rate and PQ and QT intervals were the only independent predictors of AHRE. There have been many technological advances in cardiac pacing, which mostly focused on therapeutic modalities. These include dual chamber pacing and rate modulation. In recent years, cardiac pacemakers have started to be considered as implanted arrhythmia monitors.
In the present study, pacemaker-detected AF was present in 25.1% of patients without previously documented clinical AF and in those who had dual-chamber pacemakers due to SND in 1-year follow-up. In the first 3 months after implantation of pacemakers, Healey et al. (17) detected subclinical atrial tachy-arrhythmias in one tenth of patients and 34.7% of patients had at least one episode of atrial tachy-arrhythmia during a 2.5-year follow-up. Gillis and Morck (18) evaluated 231 patients with pacemakers implanted for SND Atrial arrhythmias were detected in 68% of these. According to The Automatic Interpretation for Diagnostic Assistance study (19) 179 out of 354 (50.6%) patients had AHRE. These results are comparable with our 1-year follow-up results. Cardiac pacemakers have now enhanced monitoring capabilities, and atrial arrhythmias are recognized frequently in patients with pacemakers. These statements raise the question of whether these arrhythmias have any clinical significance. The MOST trial (20) showed that AHRE (atrial rate >220 beats/min for 10 consecutive beats) independently predicted mortality (HR: 2.48) in addition to death or nonfatal stroke (HR: 2.79), and AF (HR: 5.93). The mortality and stroke rate are almost doubled in patients with pacemakers implanted due to SND and who were found to have AHRE during device interrogation than those who were not. The ratio was 6 in the case of developing AF. These findings reveal the importance of AHRE prediction in patients with SND.
DD has significant deleterious effects on atrial mechanics, many of which are pro-arrhythmic. Studies in patients with myocardial infarction (21) or diabetes mellitus (22) have detected an increase in the risk of incident AF in patients with DD. DD is associated with increased stretch in pulmonary veins due to increased left atrial pressure (23). A subgroup analysis of the Framingham Heart Study (12) found a trend towards increased incident AF in patients with trans-mitral peak E/A greater than the median. Namdar et al. (15) have shown that diastolic ECG parameters and diastolic ECG index have valuable accuracy in diagnosing DD.
Tend-P and Tend-Q intervals reflect the electrical timing as well as mechanical diastole. These intervals were found to be shorter in the DD group. Thus, AHRE patients had statistically significantly shorter Tend-P and Tend-Q intervals. The PQ interval has been shown to be an accurate determinant of the definition of atrial contraction timing and in this way, the timing of atrial contribution to late diastolic left ventricular filling as well (24). Consequently, prolongation of the PQ interval leads to the occurrence of an atrial contraction earlier in diastole, which reduces the time of mid-diastolic slow ventricular filling and results in a shorter total diastolic phase in patients with normally functioning ventricles (25). The PQ interval was found to be significantly longer in patients with DD. Also, in our study, the PQ interval was significantly longer in patients with AHRE. ROC analysis showed that PQ >151 msec predicted AHRE with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 58.8%. The AUC was larger for PQ than for the diastolic ECG index. Prolongation of the PR interval was found to be associated with increased AF incidence in the Framingham Heart Study. PQ prolongation shows increased atrial conduction time, which may be related to an increase in AF risk. Atrial electrical and structural remodeling may also be marked by PQ prolongation. The high specificity of the PQ interval in predicting AHRE suggests that patients with a prolonged PQ interval should be further evaluated for AHRE and paroxysmal AF episodes, since AHRE are closely associated with an increased risk of stroke, as some atrial high rate episodes were caused by paroxysmal AF. Nonetheless, AHRE were missed in approximately 40% of the study population when a prolonged PQ interval was used as the sole criterion (low sensitivity), which severely limits the value of this parameter as a screening test. Therefore, a low PQ interval should not be used to rule out AHRE or paroxysmal AF. Wilcox et al. (26) showed an association between QTc duration and echocardiographic DD parameters. They showed that QTc intervals were significantly longer in patients with DD. In our study, the AHRE group also had longer QTc intervals. Namdar et al. (15) showed that diastolic ECG index [Tend-P/(PQ x age)] has the highest specificity and sensitivity in the recognition of DD. The index was significantly lower in DD patients in their study. In our AHRE group, the index was also significantly lower.
The present study was cross-sectionally designed, but it does have its own control arm (patients with no AHRE). The current study was conducted at a single academic center, and thus the results may not be directly applicable to other practice settings. Pacemaker default settings for AF detection were slightly different between manufacturers, which may have resulted in mild ascertainment bias between patients. We used left atrial diameter for the assessment of left atrial enlargement instead of left atrial volume. Finally, in this study, the relation between AHRE and echocardiographic diastolic function parameters, such as mitral valve inflow pattern and lateral and septal mitral annular tissue Doppler velocities were not evaluated. Since all diastolic time intervals on baseline ECGs were measured when the heart rate was between 60 beats/min and 90 beats/min, and the patient was not paced during acquisition of the initial ECG, the cut-off points provided in this study should only be used in patients without bradycardia, tachycardia or pacing. For all diagnostic tests, the diagnostic accuracy of the test depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population studied, according to the Bayes" theorem. The population in the present study had received a CIED due to an underlying cardiac condition, which increases the prevalence of AHRE compared with the general population. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of these parameters to detect AHRE in the general population remains unknown, and the cut-off values found in the present study for various ECG measurements should be interpreted in this context.
In conclusion, abnormal diastolic ECG parameters are powerful predisposing factors for the initiation of incident AF. Both the PQ interval and the diastolic ECG index have an acceptable diagnostic accuracy, as well as a high specificity to predict AHRE. Since AHREs are associated with paroxysmal AF and stroke, patients with a CIED and a prolonged PQ interval or shortened diastolic index should be further evaluated for the presence of paroxysmal AF, and prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered to prevent stroke. Both parameters, but especially PQ interval, lack adequate sensitivity to detect AHRE, so these parameters should not be used to rule out AHRE or paroxysmal AF. Further investigations are required to evaluate the applicability of diastolic ECG parameters in the general population without a CIED.
Financial Disclosure: No financial disclosure was declared by the authors.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;129:399-410.
2. Khairallah F, Ezzedine R, Ganz LI, London B, Saba S. Epidemiology and determinants of outcome of admissions for atrial fibrillation in the United States from 1996 to 2001. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:500-4.
3. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1561-4.
4. Liao J, Khalid Z, Scallan C, Morillo C, O'Donnell M. Noninvasive cardiac monitoring for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2007;38:2935-40.
5. Fauchier L, Briand F, Soto FX, Quennelle F, Lévy J, Darmon JP, et al. Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias: benefits of pacemaker diagnostics. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:233-8.
6. Glotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, Sweeney MO, Yee R, Marinchak R, et al. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation 2003;107:1614-9.
7. Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, Wyse DG, Singer DE, Ezekowitz MD, Hilker C, et al. The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: the TRENDS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:474-80.
8. Daoud EG, Glotzer TV, Wyse DG, Ezekowitz MD, Hilker C, Koehler J, et al. Temporal relationship of atrial tachyarrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, and systemic emboli based on stored device data: a subgroup analysis of TRENDS. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1416-23.
9. Vasan RS, Levy D. The role of hypertension in the pathogenesis of heart failure. A clinical mechanistic overview. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1789-96.
10. Tedrow UB, Conen D, Ridker PM, Cook NR, Koplan BA, Manson JE, et al. The long- and short-term impact of elevated body mass index on the risk of new atrial fibrillation the WHS (women's health study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2319-27.
11. Patil VC, Patil HV, Shah KB, Vasani JD, Shetty P. Diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes mellitus with normal systolic function. J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2011;2:213-22.
12. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Levy D, Galderisi M, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, et al. Doppler transmitral flow indexes and risk of atrial fibrillation (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1079-83.
13. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107-33.
14. Engel G, Beckerman JG, Froelicher VF, Yamazaki T, Chen HA, Richardson K, et al. Electrocardiographic arrhythmia risk testing. Curr Probl Cardiol 2004;29:365-432.
15. Namdar M, Biaggi P, Stähli B, Bütler B, Casado-Arroyo R, Ricciardi D, et al. A novel electrocardiographic index for the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. PLoS One 2013;8:e79152.
16. Chiladakis J, Kalogeropoulos A, Arvanitis P, Koutsogiannis N, Zagli F, Alexopoulos D. Heart rate-dependence of QTc intervals assessed by different correction methods in patients with normal or prolonged repolarization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010;33:553-60.
17. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;366:120-9.
18. Gillis AM, Morck M. Atrial fibrillation after DDDR pacemaker implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:542-7.
19. Defaye P, Dournaux F, Mouton E. Prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias from the automated analysis of data stored in the DDD pacemakers of 617 patients: the AIDA study. The AIDA Multicenter Study Group. Automatic Interpretation for Diagnosis Assistance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:250-5.
20. Glotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, Sweeney MO, Yee R, Marinchak R, et al. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation 2003;107:1614-9.
21. Jons C, Joergensen RM, Hassager C, Gang UJ, Dixen U, Johannesen A, et al. Diastolic dysfunction predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular systolic function: a CARISMA substudy. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:602-7.
22. From AM, Scott CG, Chen HH. The development of heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus and pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:300-5.
23. Kalifa J, Jalife J, Zaitsev AV, Bagwe S, Warren M, Moreno J, et al. Intra-atrial pressure increases rate and organization of waves emanating from the superior pulmonary veins during atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2003;108:668-71.
24. Bombardini T, Gemignani V, Bianchini E, Venneri L, Petersen C, Pasanisi E, et al. Diastolic time - frequency relation in the stress echo lab: filling timing and flow at different heart rates. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008;6:15.
25. Freedman RA, Yock PG, Echt DS, Popp RL. Effect of variation in PQ interval on patterns of atrioventricular valve motion and flow in patients with normal ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:595-602.
26. Wilcox JE, Rosenberg J, Vallakati A, Gheorghiade M, Shah SJ. Usefulness of electrocardiographic QT interval to predict left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1760-6.